In English grammar, fictitious concordance refers to the concordance (or concordance) of verbs with their subjects and pronouns with their previous nouns on the basis of meaning and not grammatical form. Also known as Synese. (Other terms for fictitious agreements are fictitious concord, semantic agreement, ad sensum agreement, logical agreement and constructio ad sensum.) None takes a singular or plural verblage, depending on the noun that follows. Alternatively, you will often see cases where a plural verbage is used with a singular noun that suggests plurality because of its importance and context. These names include couple, trio, quantity, family, crew, crowd, generation and committee. You can see a sentence like “The couple was seen in a gray car on their way out” or “The crew was about to take off”,usually coupling singular subject names (couple and crew) with a plural verblage. The H. W. Fowler specifier supports the fictitious agreement in several cases. In his dictionary of modern english usage, he writes in “none”: “It is a mistake to assume that the pronoun sings.
only &must at all cost be follow by sing. verbs &c. ; the OED expressly notes that pl. Construction is more common. If a formal agreement distracts readers from your post, it`s time to apply a fictitious agreement instead. Fictional coherence is something we don`t often pay attention to, because it`s almost instinctive, a part of our regular speaking habits. And this is not a definite rule per se, but rather a matter of preference, and it is more common in British English than in American English. If you`d rather say, “A lot of night owls approached,” don`t get me wrong. None takes a singular if what it refers to is singular, and a plural veneer if its reference is plural. If the formal agreement is not concluded to us, we will have a fictitious agreement. First of all, I understand that plural nouns require plural obstructives, and yes, “child/child” is a countable noun; “Your kids are so cute.” But when I think more and more about the meaning of the expression “7 children”, doesn`t it become a kind of dollars, miles, liters, etc. ? If our teachers have never taught us such rules, how do we know they exist? “We don`t know who first recognized that the fictitious chord exists as a powerful force in English grammar,” says Merriam-Websters Dictionary of English Usage, “but it must be a fairly new discovery.
The grammars of the 18th century never threw themselves on it, even if their examples of corrections showed that it was widely used. “Of course, you can still use a formal chord, but there will be times when the result sounds old-fashioned. If so, think of a case for a fictitious deal instead. In addition to the situations I gave in “Grammar Bite: Making Subjects and Verbs Agree,” here are a few others that follow the fictitious agreement: In Miss Thistlebottoms Hobgoblins, Theodore Bernstein argues for a fictitious correspondence under “number” without using the term. “Some people are very literal about the grammatical number,” Bernstein writes. “They tend to focus on the exact word they consider to be the subject of the sentence, so they should sometimes consider the thought that the word or words represent.” Ultimately, it is the context that comes into play, with the sentence usually providing some sort of information that highlights the pluralistic essence of what is technically a singular noun. With “The two were seen walking in a gray car”, it can be indicated that two people were seen; In the same way, “The crew has prepared for the launch” recalls many people who work together, which indicates a plurality, and it is this idea that pushes a spokesperson to prefer a plural abbreviation. .