Hold on. Do you agree with disagreeing? What does that mean? What made you look up to disagree? Please let us know where you read or heard it (including the quote, if possible). “Agree to disagree” or “agree to disagree” is an expression in English that refers to the resolution of a conflict (normally a debate or dispute), with all parties tolerating but not accepting the opposing position(s). It usually occurs when all parties recognize that other conflicts would be unnecessary, ineffective or otherwise undesirable. They can also remain friendly while they still disagree on unresolved issues. Theorist and mathematician Robert Aumann argues that two people with a common anterior probability cannot “agree not to agree” on the backward probabilities (by predicting the probability of outcomes, the theorem makes no statement about preference or value judgment over the results).  Economist Frank J. Fabozzi argues that it is not rational for investors to agree to disagree; they have to work towards a consensus, even if they have different information. For financial assets, Fabozzi postulates that investors` overconfidence in their abilities (irrationality) can lead them to “agree to disagree” if the investor thinks they are smarter than the market.  Here is a good list of expressions that should not be agreed in English: Which group is the greatest of all time? What is the best topping to put a pizza? Which superhero has the best superpowers? Try asking one of these questions in a room full of people. You will soon have an argument on your hands! Finally, you might have to agree to disagree. Agreeing to disagree is communicating with someone you disagree with.
If you agree to disagree, you accept that neither of you will change the other`s opinion. So you stop arguing and you keep going! In other words, I recommend agreeing to disagree before the conversation begins. It can be incredibly helpful to have a conversation with , “Yes, I`m going to talk to you about this difficult topic. But how about not trying to change the other person`s opinion before? And since our adversary scholars are so willing to disagree in their own translations and condemn each other (as before). (The Protestant excuse for the Roman Church is divided into three Tractes Seuerall)  There are many less essential teachings of nature. In these, we can make people think and make us think; We can “agree to disagree.” But, in the meantime, let`s remember the essentials.  Is there standard practice for options regarding the degree of agreement (no) for questionnaires? The phrase “agree to disagree” appeared in 1770 in its modern sense in print, when John Wesley, after the death of George Whitefield, wrote a commemorative sermon acknowledging the doctrinal differences between the two men, but downplaying: “Agree to disagree.” Merriam-Webster.com dictionary, merriam weaver, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/agree%20to%20disagree. Called December 1, 2020. Wesley added the sentence in quotation marks, and wrote it in a later letter to his brother Charles Whitefield (probably George Whitefield): “If you agree with me, well, if not, we can do it as Mr. . .